Test Lists

  • Regression Package Testing List Page
Publisher QA3 - UPP Test
  • Regression Package Testing List Page
1 / 0

Judges: Trump can’t exclude people from district drawings

September 10, 2020
By MIKE SCHNEIDER - Associated Press
Judges: Trump Can’t Exclude People From District Drawings
FILE - This Sunday, April 5, 2020, photo shows an envelope containing a 2020 census letter mailed to a U.S. resident in Detroit. The U.S. Census Bureau has spent much of the past year defending itself against allegations that its duties have been overtaken by politics. With a failed attempt by the Trump administration to add a citizenship question, the hiring of three political appointees with limited experience to top positions, a sped-up schedule and a directive from President Donald Trump to exclude undocumented residents from the process of redrawing congressional districts, the 2020 census has descended into a high-stakes partisan battle. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya, File)
Share this...
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — A panel of three federal judges on Thursday blocked an order from President Donald Trump that tried to exclude people in the country illegally from being counted when congressional districts are redrawn.

The federal judges in New York, in granting an injunction, said the presidential order issued in late July was unlawful and the harm it would cause would last a decade. The judges prohibited Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, whose agency oversees the U.S. Census Bureau, from excluding people in the country illegally when handing in 2020 census figures used to calculate how many congressional seats each state gets.

According to the judges, the presidential order violated laws governing the execution of the once-a-decade census and also the process for redrawing congressional districts known as apportionment by requiring that two sets of numbers be presented — one with the total count and the other dealing with people living in the country illegally.

The judges said that those in the country illegally qualify as people to be counted in the states they reside. They declined to say whether the order violated the Constitution.

“Throughout the Nation’s history, the figures used to determine the apportionment of Congress — in the language of the current statutes, the ‘total population’ and the ‘whole number of persons’ in each State — have included every person residing in the United States at the time of the census, whether citizen or non-citizen and whether living here with legal status or without,” the judges wrote.

Opponents of the order said it was an effort to suppress the growing political power of Latinos in the U.S. and to discriminate against immigrant communities of color. They also said undocumented residents use the nation’s roads, parks and other public amenities and should be taken into account for any distribution of federal resources.

The lawsuits challenging the presidential order in New York were brought by a coalition of cities, civil rights groups and states led by New York. Because the lawsuits dealt with questions about apportionment, it was heard by a three-judge panel that allows the decision to be appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.

“This is the most blatantly unconstitutional act I’ve ever encountered in years litigating the federal government,” Dale Ho, director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project, one of the group’s that challenged the order, said in an interview.

After Trump issued the order in July, a half dozen lawsuits around the U.S. were filed by states, cities and civil rights groups challenging its legality and constitutionality.

The New York case is the first to get a ruling, but there are other issues the New York judges didn’t address that could be addressed in the other court cases. Those include whether the order violated governmental administrative procedures and whether the Census Bureau will have to use a statistical method to calculate who is in the country illegally, which the Supreme Court has ruled can’t be done for apportionment numbers.

The lawsuits said there was no reliable method for counting people in the U.S. illegally and the order would have diminished the accuracy of the census.

The Commerce Department didn’t respond to an emailed inquiry.


Follow Mike Schneider on Twitter at https://twitter.com/MikeSchneiderAP

Categories: Madison Magazine Logo

Latest Stories

Eu Regulator Authorizes Astrazeneca Vaccine For All Adults

EU regulator authorizes AstraZeneca vaccine for all adults

Rayos Syndication User,
KXLY-Latest Stories

Regulators authorized AstraZeneca’s coronavirus vaccine for use in adults throughout the European Union on Friday, amid criticism the bloc is not moving fast enough to vaccinate its population.

Ex Fbi Lawyer Given Probation For Russia Probe Actions

Ex-FBI lawyer given probation for Russia probe actions

Rayos Syndication User,
KXLY-Latest Stories

WASHINGTON (AP) — A former FBI lawyer was sentenced to probation for altering an email that the Justice Department relied on during its surveillance of an aide to President Donald Trump during the Russia investigation.

Evers: Repealing Mask Mandate Like Eliminating Speed Limits

Evers: Repealing mask mandate like eliminating speed limits

Rayos Syndication User,
KXLY-Latest Stories

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Democratic Gov. Tony Evers lashed out Friday at rival Republicans who tried to repeal his statewide mask mandate, saying killing the order would be a ridiculous move comparable to abolishing speed limits.

Conservatives Praise South Carolina Win On Abortion Ban

Conservatives praise South Carolina win on abortion ban

Rayos Syndication User,
KXLY-Latest Stories

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — As some conservatives in South Carolina celebrated getting a bill that would ban almost all abortions in the state past a legislative barrier and likely becoming law, they said they are not finished trying to end all abortions.

Moscow Court Puts Navalny’s Allies Under House Arrest

Moscow court puts Navalny's allies under house arrest

Rayos Syndication User,
KXLY-Latest Stories

A Moscow court on Friday put the brother and several allies of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny under house arrest for two months as authorities sought to stymie more protests over the jailing of the top Kremlin foe.

Most Popular

Test New Article 12092025 - 4 - Message

Test New Article 12092025 - 4 - Election

Test New Article 12092025 - 2 - Closing

Test New Article 12092025 - 2 - Weather

Test New Article 12092025 - 1

Nowapp-BLOX Send 12092025

© 2025 Publisher QA3 – UPP Test.

Privacy Policy
Powered byBLOX Digital
X